In a recent press conference on February 13th, Mr. Udaya Gammanpila expressed concerns regarding a proposed abolition of the executive presidential system in Sri Lanka, labelling it as a manoeuvre aimed at stalling the upcoming presidential election.
Mr. Gammanpila argued that the emergence of this proposal, championed by non-governmental organizations and seemingly endorsed by the government, is a strategic ploy to obstruct the electoral process. He asserted that the proposal, though seemingly appealing, is designed to ensnare opposition support and ultimately delay the presidential election, similar to previous instances with local elections.
Highlighting constitutional complexities, he emphasized the necessity for a referendum alongside parliamentary approval for such an amendment. Mr. Gammanpila cautioned that potential legal challenges could prolong the process, leaving the executive presidential system intact until at least 2025.
While technically feasible to hold the presidential election under the current constitution, Mr. Gammanpila raised practical hurdles, citing a lack of funding and potential cancellation risks. He urged opposition parties to remain vigilant and not succumb to what he perceived as a government trap.
In essence, Mr Gammanpila’s remarks shed light on complex political manoeuvring, raising questions about the integrity of Sri Lanka’s electoral process amidst proposed constitutional changes.
