The Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), introduced as a temporary measure in 1979 to combat separatist terrorism prevalent at the time, has become a contentious issue in Sri Lanka. Now, 15 years after the conclusion of the three-decade-long civil war, the continued enforcement of this law is raising significant concerns. Critics argue that the PTA is being misused to suppress political opponents, protests, strikes, and journalists. Furthermore, its provisions have created conflicts with international laws to which Sri Lanka is a signatory and bound.
Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa highlighted these issues, noting that several members of the current government had previously expressed opposition to the PTA both in Parliament and outside it. He called for clarity on whether the government plans to repeal the law or introduce amendments to address its controversial aspects.
Speaking in Parliament today under Standing Order 27 (2), Premadasa directly questioned the government on its stance regarding the PTA. He sought to understand the government’s commitment to implementing the law and the alternative measures being considered to amend it. He also demanded a comprehensive report on individuals arrested under the PTA.
In his address, Premadasa further questioned the actions taken against those detained under the Act, the government’s position on the 72-hour detention period, and the practice of arresting individuals without a warrant. He emphasized the importance of ensuring that these measures align with international human rights standards.
